• WordPress Documentation Team - Know who is in charge and who to turn to
• Guidelines - The heavenly handbook of Codex rules.
• Styles - Documentation of the general styles of the Codex — please follow these so pages look well together.
• Sandbox - Your experimental playground
• Contributing - How to help out at the Codex
• Editing - How to layout and design a Codex page
• Codex Tasks - Things needing to be done and sign up list

Discussions on the Codex

Discussions on the Codex and Wp-docs mailing list are restricted to topics related to writing WordPress documentation. To post a question about information on an article in the Codex, use the Discussion Tab at the top of the article's page. To post a question to an individual Codex user, visit their User Page and post the question in their Discussion page. Answers will be posted on your User Discussion page. Sign all comments and discussions with four tildes (~) and it will display your name and time with a link to your User Page like this:
Fred Smith 03:07, 10 Apr 2014 (UTC)

Again, welcome and let us know how we can help you help us on the WordPress Codex.

MichaelH (talk) 15:40, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

reverted edit

Hi

I've (yet again) reverted your edit linking out to the managewp site. Please do not relink this site. I've browsed through a number of your edits, and your tendancy I've noticed is to make links out to external sites, many of which appear to be your own. This practice is frowned upon. Please enhance the codex articles rather than linking to external resources.

Thanks mrmist 09:49, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Reverted "links"

Vladimir--you asked in the email to me "I am wondering what do I have to do in order to preserve to codex edits. Most recently I added a link to the ManageWP.com clone/migrate site tool to External Resources section http://codex.wordpress.org/Moving_WordPress and I understand it was edited out by you."

Please just don't throw links into articles. This has been pointed out in the past (e.g. see the section right above this).

--MichaelH (talk) 13:13, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Email Vladimir External - "resources section of the article is meant for links (only). I would understand your point if a link to ManageWP was irrelevant to what the article was talking about, but on the contrary the tool we provide is a better one than the one that is already listed in the article. Can you please point me to the Wiki rule that is being breached here?"

Sir, Generally the feeling is that Codex is not a site to advertise one's products. --MichaelH (talk) 11:59, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Sir, Please see Links to Commercial Content and Sites --MichaelH (talk) 15:52, 12 May 2014 (UTC)