- WordPress Documentation Team - Know who is in charge and who to turn to
- Guidelines - The heavenly handbook of Codex rules.
- Styles - Documentation of the general styles of the Codex — please follow these so pages look well together.
- Sandbox - Your experimental playground
- Contributing - How to help out at the Codex
- Editing - How to layout and design a Codex page
- Codex Tasks - Things needing to be done and sign up list
- Discussions on the Codex
- Discussions on the Codex and Wp-docs mailing list are restricted to topics related to writing WordPress documentation. To post a question about information on an article in the Codex, use the Discussion Tab at the top of the article's page. To post a question to an individual Codex user, visit their User Page and post the question in their Discussion page. Answers will be posted on your User Discussion page. Sign all comments and discussions with four tildes (~) and it will display your name and time with a link to your User Page like this:
Fred Smith 03:07, 10 Apr 2014 (UTC)
Again, welcome and let us know how we can help you help us on the WordPress Codex.
- Boneill (talk) 10:44, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Codex Cleanup
No one has come up with one, yet, and access to the database is limited to a very, very few. If you have such a script, then wonderful, but it it isn't as easy as that. A lot of the old articles contain a combination of PRE and CODE and TT all jumbled up. A clean search and replace would then mean these would still have to be manually checked for their funky use. There is a big problem with mediawiki markup and html and people often get confused and over markup their stuff.
More importantly, it helps people who know NOTHING about how this all works to "do" something. The more they do, the more they get comfortable, and the more comfortable...hook, line, sinker. There are probably at most 50 articles that still have this usage, so it gives them something to do and hunt for, which leads to bigger things...heee heee haaa haa..
I really have to work on my evil laugh. Just doesn't work here. Great idea, though. Lorelle 21:52, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)